The court decided that the law violated the doctrine of “separation of powers”, the idea that the three branches of the government–the courts, the governor, and the legislature–have defined roles and should not interfere with each other. Because the law imposed more restrictions than a Washington court rule, the court held that the law impermissibly interfered with the judicial branch’s rules.
Last September, the same court struck down a law requiring potential plaintiffs to obtain a “certificate of merit” from a doctor stating that the care the plaintiff received was negligent. If the injured person couldn’t obtain the certificate in time, they couldn’t file the complaint.
The District of Columbia passed a similar 90-day-notice law in 2009. Backers said the law would encourage pre-litigation settlement, but in practice it has not led to any measurable numbers in terms of settlement of any significant medical malpractice cases. In addition, If a patient is not aware of the requirement and files to follow the rules, that patient’s case might be dismissed even if the patient has a very strong case of medical malpractice.
Maryland, and Virginia also have “certificate of merit” requirements as well. For these reasons it is very important for patients and their families to hire experienced attorneys and law firms who specialize in medical malpractice to be certain that your rights are protected.