Regan Zambri Long PLLC
English Español
Call Now 202-960-4596
Menu
07/26/07   |   By

Supreme Court to Hear Major Medical Device Liability Case | DC Metro Area Personal Injury Law Blog

5 stars

The U.S. Supreme Court recently agreed to hear a product liability case with significant implications for the medical device industry and for any patient treated with medical devices.  The Public Citizen Litigation Group is representing Charles Riegel, in the case Riegel v. Medtronic; a case stemming from an incident in which Mr. Riegel was seriously injured by a defective cardiac catheter.  Medtronic asserts that the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act preempts state laws damages actions brought by injured patients in cases where the injury resulted from a device permanently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

According to Public Citizen, the question to be resolved by the court is, “Whether the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act expressly preempts state-law actions brought by patients who have been injured by medical devices that received premarket approval by the FDA.”  The court will hear the case next fall.

Previously on the DC Metro Area Personal Injury Law Blog, we have reported on defective Kugel hernia patches.

If you or a family member believe that you have a case involving personal injury or a defective product, please contact us on-line at Regan Zambri & Long or call us at (202) 463-3030 for a free consultation.  If you would like to receive our complimentary electronic newsletter, please click here.

Regan Zambri Long
Posted In
Uncategorized
Share This Article

Archives

Schedule a Free Consultation

Have you or your loved one sustained injuries in Washington DC, Maryland or Virginia? Regan Zambri Long PLLC has the best lawyers in the country to analyze your case and answer the questions you may have.

Call 202-960-4596

  • Please do not send any confidential or sensitive information in this form. This form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Back to Top